Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Review - "Agatha Christie's Poirot: The Labours of Hercules"


"The Labours of Hercules" was an unusual choice for the penultimate episode of "Agatha Christie's Poirot." The book, which is really a collection of short stories, would have made for much better adapting in the late '80's, when the show was still adapting Agatha Christie's short stories to the screen. But, as I saw with "The Big Four," the production team behind the show can make unusual stories work well. Did they manage to do it again?

Hercule Poirot (David Suchet) is on the trail of the thief, Marrascaud. The cunning criminal has evaded capture before, but the Belgian detective is sure he can snare him. But everything go awry and a young girl ends up murdered. Poirot contemplates retirement, that is until he's enticed into a case by his chauffeur. It seems that the young man's sweetheart has disappeared to a villa in the Swiss alps with her employer. Poirot heads for the hotel where she is believed to be staying and soon discovers that not only is Marrascaud rumoured to be at the hotel, but soon there's a murder...

I do apologise if the synopsis for "The Labours of Hercules" is a bit vague, but I honestly had very little idea what I was watching. While "Dead Man's Folly," the show's previous entry was a great success, this episode was dire indeed. I have sadly never read Christie's collection of short stories (it sits on my shelf so hopefully I won't neglect it for long), so I cannot say which elements of her book made it into the adaptation. If there were any, it seems like they were thrown together without much thought as to whether it would move the plot forward. Much of the first half was occupied by characters sitting and talking to each other, about topics which couldn't possibly have any bearing on the plot. It was not until the episode's half-way mark did anything befitting the mystery genre occur.

It is a real pity that this story would end up being the penultimate episode to the entire series' run. It was very disappointing, especially since it had such great talent behind it. David Suchet handled Poirot brilliantly. Though the detective is supposed to be depressed in the story's beginning, as a result of his failure to capture Marrascaud, Suchet restrained his performance wonderfully. One only needs to look at the equally upsetting adaptation of "Murder on the Orient Express" to see that Poirot is quite capable of hamming it up. While we;re talking about positives, visually the episode was great. The interiors and exteriors of the hotel and the alps were beautiful.

Alas, "The Labours of Hercules" was a major disappointment. I would have rather seen ITV adapt Christie's play, "Black Coffee" than this. I am forced to give "The Labours of Hercules" 1 out of 5 stars. But don't worry, I'm not so critical of "Curtain."

2 comments:

  1. We scientists have a useful term for adaptations like this. That term is "bull****".

    Seriously, guys, this wasn't THE LABOURS OF HERCULES. This was two or three stories from the LABORUS hastily combined, and with "clever" references to other stories. Hey, it's a dirty politician! Hey, it's the Countess! Hey, it's a dog named Cerberus! Aren't we so clever! LOLZ!

    What the heck was up with the dark lighting, so dark and monochromatic that I had a really hard time seeing what the heck was going on in this episode? What the heck was up with the hokey acting? And worst of all, when did POIROT become ELEMENTARY? Why are they trying to make a genius detective fit in the mould of the "fallible", "human", angst-ridden detective, complete with a piece of useless dead meat -- I mean an innocent young woman who gets horribly butchered at the start of the film because everyone, Poirot included, was a complete idiot. Hey, let's demonstrate the oh-so-secret communication signal IN FRONT OF EVERYONE AT A FRIGGIN' PARTY!!!

    I'm sorry, I need to restart before my inner circuitry fries. I've been largely silent during these recaps of yours, but I needed to vent here.

    I look forward to your piece on CURTAIN. I have one major complaint about it, though, and that is the complete ignorance of Catholicism demonstrated by the filmmakers. You would think that someone somewhere on the production team at least knows someone who *knows* a Catholic. They apparently didn't even Google the Rosary...

    But that's for next time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad I wasn't the only one disappointed with this *adaptation*. Following its initial airing, fans were pleased with the episode, something which I cannot understand. It is certainly one of the most disappointing episodes.

      As for "Curtain," I really had no idea what to expect from the episode, but I found myself pleasantly surprised. That review should be along shortly.

      Delete